Marketing School of Thoughts
1. Non-interactive
Balance of
power, in which one party in the marketing process (usually the producers), was
portrayed as an action agent who has impact on the behavior of buyers in the
market place. In 1960s and 70s, the positions were reversed and focused on the
consumer as the primary party of importance and action in the marketing
process.
Conclusion
Persuasion
or selling (buying) becomes the primary focus in this study.
2. Interactive
Forces the
theorist to think of reactions to a marketing activity by one party and counter-reactions
by the other party.
Banoma,
Bagozzi and Zaltman (1978) summarized the distinction between the interactive
(dyadic) vis Noninteractive (unit) perspective, P21:
1.
Behavior cannot be explained
independently of the context
2.
To reduce explanations into
constructs which violate the structure of interaction will cause confusion
3.
Adopt social perspective for
marketing analysis
Four main
variables (P21):
1.
Relational
variables – nature of connections between the actors in the dyad
2.
Social
structural variables – Conditions of the situation the dyad
occurs and social positions the dyad occupy
3.
Social
actor variables – Characteristics of individuals contribute
or hinder the dyad relationship
4.
Normative
variables – regarding how people ought to behave.
Conclusion:
Interactive
perspective of marketing thought is more concerned with the interdependent
relationship between marketing actors. Exchange or relationship becomes the
focus of study.
3. Economic P22
Actions of marketing actors were considered to be
driven by economic values
·
Marketing
system objective was to fulfill basic consumer needs in the most efficient ways
to max. profits by the producers, channel members and consumers
Conclusion
·
Narrow perspective
about buyers and sellers’ behavior
·
Tends to be normative
·
Relates back to the
origins of marketing as a subdiscipline of economics assoiated with a distinct
domain of human behavior.
4. Non-economic P22
·
Focus
on the social and psychological factors that may influence the behavior of marketing
actors
1.
Producers
strive for long term stability and survival
2.
Distribution
channel structure is the result of the interplay between power, conflict and
channel norms
3.
Consumer
behavior is the result of complex psychological motivations and pervasive social
pressures
Conclusion
·
Tends to be descriptive
·
Basic philosophies of
human motivation and human behavior is the key values and orientation
Ei kommentteja:
Lähetä kommentti